Skip to content
China's exports rose 25% in August — or 18.6%, depending which currency you read
Back to Blog

China's exports rose 25% in August — or 18.6%, depending which currency you read

Uzair bin Haroon

China's exports rose 25.0% in August. They also rose 18.6%. Same month, same customs agency, same release on 8 September 2026 — the first figure is in US dollars, the second is in yuan, and the 6.4-point gap between them is the currency, not the cargo. If you buy parts out of China, that gap is the first thing to understand about this release, because it is the reason two suppliers can quote you two different versions of the same market.

I am not an economist and I do not read customs bulletins for pleasure. I read them because what is in them turns up six weeks later in a box on the goods-in bench, and because the way it turns up is rarely a price change.

Two numbers, one month

In dollar terms, exports grew 25.0% year on year in August, quickening from 23.9% in July and landing exactly on the Reuters poll. Imports rose 28.2%, up from 27.5%, and missed a 30% consensus. The surplus came in at $119.09 billion against $112.5 billion in July — a record month.

In yuan, Xinhua reporting the same General Administration of Customs data has August exports at +18.6% and imports at +21.7%, with total August trade of 4.65 trillion yuan, above the 4-trillion mark for a sixth consecutive month. For January to August: total trade 34.78 trillion yuan, +17.6%; exports 20.17 trillion yuan, +14.6%; imports 14.61 trillion yuan, +22.0%.

The offshore yuan stood at 6.7099 to the dollar after the release and is up 3.8% against the dollar this year. That is where your 6.4 points went. Brad Setser of the Council on Foreign Relations reckons the currency is still undervalued by about 20%, which is a separate argument, but the arithmetic point holds: a supplier telling you Chinese export demand is up a quarter and a supplier telling you it is up a fifth can both be reading the same sheet.

Where it went

August 2026, year on yearFigure
Exports, all destinations (USD)+25.0% — in line with the Reuters poll
Exports to the United States+34.4%, $42.5bn
Exports to Southeast Asia+30.2%
Exports to Latin America+17.5%
Exports to the European Union+6.6%
Semiconductor exports+129.8%
Auto exports+43%
Imports, all origins (USD)+28.2% — consensus was 30%
Imports from the United States+17.8%, $13.3bn
Imports from the European Union+0.7%
Trade surplus$119.09bn, up from $112.5bn in July

Figures from CNBC's and the Associated Press's readings of the customs release, 8 September 2026, both linked below.

Read the export column top to bottom. The United States at +34.4% partly reflects a soft base after last year's tariff-driven collapse, which AP says plainly. Southeast Asia at +30.2% does not have that excuse. The European Union at +6.6% is the outlier in the other direction, and imports from the EU at +0.7% are effectively flat. Those two lines together describe a trade relationship that has stopped growing in both directions.

Thumbnail from a chamber-of-commerce video briefing on China's August 2026 foreign trade data
The same release read for European business, covering August trade and August producer prices in one briefing. From 9th September 2026: August Foreign Trade Data by The European Union Chamber of Commerce in China.

The import miss is the line that reaches your bench

Imports at +28.2% against a 30% consensus sounds like a quibble. It is the sixth undershoot in eight months. Zhiwei Zhang of Pinpoint Asset Management put it as China continuing to lean on exporters while domestic demand stays subdued, and China's second-quarter GDP growth of 4.3% — a more than three-year low, against a 4.5–5% target — says the same thing from a different direction.

Here is why that matters if your job is making something work rather than forecasting anything. Put the import miss next to what the factory-gate data said the day after. We went through the August PPI split on this site yesterday: producer input costs up 5.8%, consumer goods output prices down 0.5%. Input costs climbing, selling prices not. Record export volumes.

A factory in that position has three moves. Raise the price, which loses the order. Eat the margin, which it will do for a while. Or change the part and keep the price, which is the one you will not see on the invoice.

What the third move looks like at 2am

The third move is never announced. It arrives as a part that passes the drawing and fails the job.

Plating is the classic. A fastener specified for a given coating thickness still measures as "zinc plated" at a third of it. It passes a visual, it passes a thread gauge, and it goes white in a month in a Karachi monsoon. You will not find that with calipers; you find it with a coating thickness gauge or a salt spray result, and almost nobody asks for either on a repeat order.

Bearings are the expensive one. Internal clearance class is a single letter on a box and several thousandths of a millimetre in the housing. Drop a class and the spindle runs, warms, and loses the surface finish at hour four of a night shift. The part number on the box was right. The part was not.

Castings go the other way — they get thinner. Wall section at the bosses is where a foundry saves metal, and porosity shows up after the machining pass has already been paid for, which is the worst place to find it. Weldments lose weld length before they lose weld quality. Gearboxes lose case depth. Electrical assemblies lose conductor cross-section inside an unchanged jacket, which you can only see by stripping a sample and measuring it.

None of this is new and none of it requires bad faith. It is what cost pressure does to a bill of materials when the order book is full and the margin is not. A record export month with compressing producer margins is precisely the condition that makes it worth doing.

Thumbnail from a freight-market video on China export container rates in August 2026
The freight side of the same month, including the EU's low-value parcel rule. From China Freight Down in August 2026: Good News for Importers? by SINO Shipping.

What I would change on the next order

Not the supplier. Changing supplier on a price suspicion costs you the one thing you have, which is a known failure mode.

Change the paperwork. Name the coating thickness and the test method in the purchase order, not just the coating. Ask for the mill certificate against the heat number on the actual batch rather than a certificate on file from a year ago, and check the heat number matches the tag on the bar. Specify the bearing clearance class in writing and make it a rejection criterion. On castings, agree a wall-thickness check point and measure it on three parts from every third batch, not on the first-article sample that everyone knows is made carefully.

And keep the first-article parts. A drawer of known-good samples is the cheapest quality system there is, and it is the only way you will ever prove a part changed when the part number did not.

One more thing from the top of this piece. When you negotiate, know which currency the other side is quoting the market in. A supplier arguing that export demand is up 25% is quoting you a dollar figure that includes a 3.8% currency move in your favour. The yuan number is 18.6%. Both are true. Only one of them is about factories.

If you are sourcing industrial parts out of China and want the specification written so it cannot quietly drift, send us the drawing and the quantity and we will tell you which lines on it actually need policing.

Sources